Industrial Engineering

Time Study Calculator

Compute normal and standard time from observations, rating factor, and allowance.

Last updated: How we build & verify
Number of Observations
5
Observed Average Time
30.00s
Normal Time
33.00s
Standard Time
37.95s

What This Means For You

Get a personalized explanation of these results — what they actually mean for your situation, and how small changes would affect them.

How it works

Stopwatch time study turns a handful of observed cycles into a defensible standard time. The observed average is adjusted by a rating factor, because the operator you happened to watch was working faster or slower than a trained average worker, and then padded with an allowance for the rest, fatigue, and unavoidable delays that no continuous observation captures.

Formula
Observed time = mean of the timed cycles
Normal time = Observed time × Rating factor
Standard time = Normal time × (1 + Allowance)
Variables
  • Rating factorobserver judgement of pace against a normal worker; 1.00 is normal, 1.10 is 10% faster than normal
  • Allowanceadded fraction covering personal needs, fatigue, and unavoidable delay (PF&D)
  • Normal timehow long the task takes at a normal pace, before any allowance
  • Standard timethe figure used for costing, capacity planning, and line balancing
Worked example
Inputs: Cycles of 30, 32, 28, 31, 29 seconds; rating 1.10; allowance 15%
  1. Observed average: (30 + 32 + 28 + 31 + 29) / 5 = 30.00 s
  2. Normal time: 30.00 × 1.10 = 33.00 s
  3. Standard time: 33.00 × 1.15 = 37.95 s
  4. Standard output: 3600 / 37.95 = 94.9 pieces per hour
Result: 37.95 seconds standard time, about 95 pieces per hour
Notes
  • Two allowance conventions are in circulation and they do not agree. This uses the percentage-of-normal-time form, Standard = Normal × (1 + A). The percentage-of-total-work-time form, Standard = Normal / (1 - A), gives 38.82 seconds on the same inputs, a 2.3% difference that compounds across a full line balance. State which one your standards were built on.
  • Rating is the weakest link in the whole method and the one that gets challenged in a grievance. Trained analysts using the same video routinely differ by 5 to 10 percentage points, which is why rating practice against benchmark films is part of the qualification and why a lone unrated study is hard to defend.
  • Five cycles is enough to demonstrate the arithmetic and not enough to set a standard. The required sample follows from the observed variability and the confidence and precision you want; the standard formula is n = (40 × sqrt(n′·Σx² minus (Σx)²) / Σx)² for 95% confidence and ±5% precision, and high-variability tasks can demand fifty cycles or more.
  • Strip outliers only when you can name the cause. A cycle interrupted by a dropped part or a supervisor question is not part of the task and comes out with a written note; a slow cycle with no explanation stays in, because it is telling you the method is not stable.
  • Allowances of 10% to 15% cover ordinary bench work. Heavy lifting, heat, awkward posture, or high visual concentration justify more, and the ILO tables assign specific increments per condition rather than leaving it to judgement.

Most Searched Today

Frequently Asked Questions

Time Study Calc runs right in the browser tab you already have open. No install, no account, no cost.

Time Study Calc follows the standard method used in textbooks and technical references for this calculation, and we show the formula or approach on the page itself so you can check the working rather than trust a black box. Found an edge case that breaks it? Use the feedback button in the bottom-right corner.

Time Study Calculator | ExaCalc